The Federal government's grant program aimed at supporting businesses impacted by the live export phase-out is facing significant backlash from industry stakeholders. Critics argue that the application process has discouraged participation and failed to adequately address the financial losses incurred since the announcement of the phase-out. This comprehensive guide covers grant process a "turn-off" for businesses adapting to live export phase-out in detail.
Understanding Grant Process A "turn-off" For Businesses Adapting To Live Export Phase-out
Despite the Federal government introducing a $138 to $139 million support package for the sector, many believe this amount is insufficient compared to the revenue lost due to the live export phase-out. Ben Sutherland, president of the Livestock and Rural Transport Association of WA and organizer of Keep The Sheep, expressed deep skepticism about the adequacy of the funding. "It's not even a drop in the ocean, because we are now two years into it since the announcement. People are still suffering over that announcement," Sutherland stated, emphasizing the ongoing struggles faced by affected businesses. Learn more on Investopedia.
The discontent is palpable among industry members who feel that their needs have been overlooked. Sutherland pointed out that many businesses opted not to apply for the grants, citing the convoluted application process as a primary deterrent. "The daunting process to employ a grant writer and make sure your I's were dotted and your T's were crossed was a bit of a turn-off," he said. This sentiment resonates with many who are navigating a challenging economic landscape.
Application Process Deters Participation
The application process for the Supply Chain Capacity Program has been characterized as time-consuming and complex, particularly for businesses already stretched thin during peak operational periods. Sutherland mentioned that for transporters engaged in Western Australia's largest harvest, dedicating 10 to 12 hours to complete a grant application was simply not feasible. "How the transition application looked would be a turn-off for some people too, especially for transporters right in the middle of harvest as well," he noted.
Out of more than 260 applicants for the initial round of grants, only 45 were successful. This includes five processing businesses that received the bulk of the funding, raising concerns about equity in the distribution of resources. Sutherland criticized the selection criteria, likening the chances of success to winning a lottery. "You might as well go and get a Powerball ticket," he remarked, underscoring the frustration many feel regarding the bureaucratic nature of the process.
Voices of Discontent Regarding Federal Response
There is a growing sentiment among industry participants that the Federal government has not adequately engaged with those affected by the live export phase-out. Sutherland voiced his disappointment, stating, "The Federal government has not listened one iota. I don't care what the rest of the world says, they have not listened to the supply chain at all. They've taken the industry away from us." This lack of communication has left many feeling alienated and unsupported in a turbulent time.
The frustration is compounded by the realities on the ground, with businesses grappling with various Challenges exacerbated by the government's decision. As the industry adapts to the new landscape, many are questioning the sustainability of their operations without sufficient support. The past few years have been marked by hardship, and Sutherland lamented the toll it has taken on the industry as a whole.
Survey Reveals Mixed Reactions to Funding
In light of these concerns, a recent survey conducted by Farm Weekly sought to gauge the industry's reaction to the grant program. Out of 31 responses, a significant 87 percent expressed interest in the funding. However, many cited barriers that prevented them from applying, including the complexity of the process and the uncertainty surrounding the outcomes. Respondents indicated a mix of intentions regarding future applications and whether they could transition their businesses without financial support.
The feedback from the survey reflects a broader unease within the sector, where many are adjusting their flock numbers in response to market conditions and regulatory changes. While interest in the funding remains high, the hurdles associated with the application process have created a sense of disillusionment among potential applicants.
As the industry continues to grapple with the implications of the live export phase-out, the need for a more accessible and responsive support mechanism is evident. Stakeholders are calling for a reassessment of how assistance is provided to ensure that it meets the needs of those most affected. The path forward will require greater collaboration and understanding between the government and industry participants to foster a resilient agricultural sector.
Originally reported by Farm Weekly. View original.